X::Cannot::Empty Reference
Error due to inappropriate usage of an empty collection
What it is #
Routines #
Signatures are reproduced from the documentation, including their declared return types. A routine listed here is part of the type's published interface; whether Raku++ implements it is a separate question, answered by the examples below.
method action #
method action()
Verbal description of the inappropriate action.
method what #
method what()
Returns the type that was the target of the action.
Examples, run three ways #
Every example below comes from the official documentation, together with the output that documentation asserts. Each was then executed by Rakudo and by Raku++ when this page was built. Where the three agree, one result is shown; where they do not, all three are — because which of them is wrong is exactly the information worth having.
1 no-output · 1 rakupp-differs
class X::Cannot::Empty is Exception { }Not executed: the documentation states no expected output for this example.
class Stack {
my class Node {
has $.value;
has Node $.next;
}
has Node $!next;
method push($value) {
$!next .= new(:$value, :$!next);
self;
}
method pop() {
fail X::Cannot::Empty.new(:action<pop>, :what(self.^name))
unless $!next;
my $value = $!next.value;
$!next .= next;
$value;
}
}
my $stack = Stack.new.push(42);
say $stack.pop; # OUTPUT: «42»
try $stack.pop;
say $!.message; # OUTPUT: «Cannot pop from an empty Stack»42
Cannot pop from an empty Stack
42
Cannot pop from an empty Stack
42
No such method 'new' for invocant of type 'X::Cannot::Empty'
Raku++ disagrees with both the documentation and Rakudo — a defect.