Rules / Operators / comma

: Skeleton

infix :

:
infixcomma 21/27list-assocRaku++ runs this — matches Rakudo on all 7docs.raku.org ↗

The rules for : have not been written yet. Everything below is extracted rather than authored: the official documentation supplies the classification, and the interpreters were asked directly about the rest.

What is established #

Classification #

: is parsed as an infix at the comma precedence level, list-associative.

That is level 21 of 27 on the ladder, counting from the tightest. Operators sharing a level bind equally; grouping among them is decided by associativity alone.

What the interpreter said #

Raku++ parses this spelling. Asked to compile:

my $a = 6; my $b = 3; sink($a : $b)

…it got through the parser. On its own that establishes very little: it says nothing about whether the construct executes, let alone whether the result is right. Where the behaviour table below exists, that is the stronger evidence — those expressions were actually run.

Covered upstream #

The official documentation has a section for this construct: docs.raku.org. Until the rules here are written, that is the better reference.

Observed behaviour #

Each expression below was executed by both interpreters when this page was built; the results are recorded, not written. The operands are chosen to cross the boundaries that catch people out: string against number, a list where a scalar was meant, a boolean, an undefined value, and an exact rational.

Raku++ and Rakudo agree on every row below.

ExpressionRaku++Rakudo
1 : 2rejected by both — Parse error
"a" : "b"rejected by both — Parse error
1 : "2"rejected by both — Parse error
(1, 2) : (3, 4, 5)rejected by both — Parse error
True : Falserejected by both — Parse error
Nil : 1rejected by both — No such method 'Nil' for invocant of type 'Pair'
1/2 : 1/3rejected by both — Parse error